Day: December 18, 2025

Blue figure on blocks, representing business vs IT, closing alignment gap.

Business vs IT in Data Projects: How to Close the Alignment Gap

Business vs IT in Data Initiatives—Bridging the Gap Even the most well-funded data initiatives fail when business and IT aren’t aligned.CDOs, CIOs, BI Directors, and Data Governance Leaders often describe the same challenge: IT focuses on platforms and security, while the business demands speed, insights, and usability. But this divide isn’t inevitable. With the right data strategy, governance framework, and collaboration model, organizations can turn friction into high-performance alignment. Business–IT misalignment in data initiatives often stems from unclear ownership, competing priorities, and lack of shared metrics. A strong data governance maturity model provides structure and accountability. Aligning business and IT requires co-owned data domains, joint roadmap planning, and outcome-based KPIs. Think of data initiatives as business transformation, not technology projects. Why Do Business and IT Disagree on Data Projects? Their goals, timelines, and incentives differ. 1. Competing Priorities Business wants: fast insights self-service analytics flexible dashboards agility IT wants: stability security scalability cost control These competing priorities show up as: BI teams wanting new data fields this week, while IT schedules them next quarter Business units building shadow analytics teams to move faster IT blocking tools the business wants due to compliance or architectural concerns Why does IT slow down analytics projects? IT isn’t intentionally slowing things down—its responsibility is risk mitigation, data protection, and ensuring architectural consistency. Without those guardrails, analytics efforts can introduce security gaps, inconsistent definitions, or unmanageable technical debt. What Causes Friction Between BI and IT? Data leaders consistently cite four root causes: 1. Unclear Data Ownership When no one knows who owns: data quality definitions permissions lineage …you get delays, disagreements, and finger-pointing.Modern governance requires data domain ownership, not centralized bottlenecks. 2. BI Is Treated as an “IT Service Desk” Many BI teams are stuck handling: ad-hoc reports business requests without context endless dashboard changes This reactionary model frustrates both sides. 3. No Shared Data Strategy If your organization doesn’t have: a documented data strategy a roadmap tied to business outcomes a data governance maturity model to measure progress …then each team effectively builds its own plan. 4. Different Definitions of “Done” For business teams, “done” might mean: the dashboard is usable For IT, “done” means: the system is secure, tested, integrated, compliant, and sustainable This misalignment slows everything. How to Align Business and IT in Your Data Strategy This is where leaders—CDOs, CIOs, BI Directors—must step in.Alignment is designed, not assumed. 1. Establish a Shared Data Strategy A good enterprise data strategy connects technology with business outcomes.It should explicitly outline: strategic business objectives data capabilities needed success metrics governance model operating model 👉 Many organizations bring in data strategy consultants to accelerate this stage. 2. Define a Data Governance Maturity Model A structured maturity model clarifies what “good” looks like.Most models measure: Data quality Metadata management Master data Privacy/security Literacy Operating model Stewardship This creates a common language between business and IT. Who owns data governance—business or IT? Modern governance is business-led and IT-enabled. Business owns definitions and quality. IT owns infrastructure and security. Governance teams coordinate and enforce policies. 3. Create a Cross-Functional Data Operating Model Top companies use a hub-and-spoke or federated model, where Business units own data meaning and quality IT owns data platforms and pipelines A central data office sets standards, policies, and architecture BI/Analytics teams sit closer to the business This model reduces bottlenecks and accelerates delivery. Operating Model Components: Data councils Data domain owners Data stewards BI governance committees Joint roadmap prioritization Without this structure, siloed decision-making persists. 4. Share KPIs and Incentives A simple fix with massive impact: Shared KPIs between Business & IT: Time-to-insight Data quality scores Dashboard adoption Reduction in shadow IT Governance policy compliance This shifts the mindset from “your project vs. my project” to “our outcomes.” Want to benchmark your organization’s maturity? Get our free Data Governance Maturity Assessment and compare your capabilities to industry standards. 5. Build a Unified Data Roadmap Your roadmap must be co-owned—ideally through a Data Council with equal representation. A unified roadmap prevents: surprise priorities duplicated efforts platform decisions made without business input BI commitments made without IT feasibility checks Recommended roadmap structure: foundational capabilities governance initiatives data platform enhancements analytics & business use cases literacy & enablement programs How do you prevent shadow analytics teams from forming? Provide faster delivery, better data products, and clearer governance. Shadow teams emerge when the official process is slow or rigid. 6. Enable the Business With Guardrails Not “command and control.”Not “free-for-all self-service.”The sweet spot is guided self-service. Guided Self-Service Includes: certified datasets governed BI tool access semantic layer or metrics layer design standards training programs data literacy initiatives This empowers the business to move fast—safely. Case Example: Reducing Friction Through Governance A global insurance company struggled with: BI reports built differently in every region analysts scraping data manually IT overwhelmed by ticket requests They implemented: domain-based data ownership cross-functional steering committees a unified data catalog a shared KPI dashboard a BI Center of Excellence Results within 12 months: 40% reduction in duplicated analytics work 3x increase in report adoption 60% fewer IT tickets for data access faster decision-making at the executive level Bridging the Gap: A Practical Framework Use this fast-start alignment checklist: 1. Diagnose Misalignment Are priorities documented? Are definitions consistent? Do teams share KPIs? Do you have a shared roadmap? 2. Build Governance Foundations Data domains Stewardship roles Maturity model Policies and standards 3. Implement an Operating Model Data Council Architecture review board BI governance Enablement paths 4. Align Around Business Value Business-led use cases Co-owned success metrics Iterative delivery Business–IT friction is not a technical problem—it’s an operating model, governance, and strategy problem.When organizations implement a clear data strategy, define ownership, and create shared accountability, data becomes not just an asset but a competitive advantage. Frequently Asked Questions 1. Why do business and IT disagree on data initiatives? Because they have different priorities—business wants speed and insights; IT prioritizes stability, security, and sustainability. 2. How can business and IT align on data strategy? Create a co-owned

Read More »
Two phones with coins transferring between them, representing a tech fix.

A Payments Giant Quietly Fixed Its Biggest Tech Bottleneck

In every growing enterprise, especially in regulated industries like finance and payments, there comes a point when what once worked stops working. Processes begin to diverge. Infrastructure becomes tribal. Release velocity slows, while risk quietly rises. This is the story of one such transformation, where a national-scale payment infrastructure provider moved from inconsistency and invisible risk to governance, speed, and operational clarity. It’s a case study in how DevOps, done right, can be a business enabler, not just an engineering improvement. The Context: Stability at the Cost of Velocity The organization in question is a national payment network operating in a tightly regulated financial environment. It connects banks, credit unions, and third-party payment processors and processes millions of transactions every day. For years, the systems were reliable. The teams were committed. Releases happened. Systems ran. But behind that surface-level calm, deeper issues had started to emerge: Different teams had built their own CI/CD pipelines. Infrastructure provisioning was still manual in many places. Rollback processes were inconsistent, sometimes undocumented. Governance existed, but outside the delivery process. Cloud costs were rising faster than the pace of delivery. Visibility across environments was fragmented and reactive. It wasn’t a crisis. But it was unsustainable. As one of their senior leaders put it:“We’ve grown fast, but we’ve accumulated too many ways of doing the same thing and too many gaps that only individuals remember to close.” The Problem: Lack of Systemic Trust From a CXO’s perspective, the issue wasn’t tooling or talent. It was the absence of systemic trust. Trust that every environment was consistent. Trust that every release has passed the same tests and validations. Trust that compliance wasn’t a separate checklist but built into the process. Trust that rollbacks were available and wouldn’t require heroics. In short, the systems weren’t broken, but they couldn’t scale. And in regulated environments, anything that can’t scale safely becomes a liability. The Mandate: Rebuild Delivery with Control and Confidence The brief was clear: “Create a delivery foundation where speed, compliance, rollback safety, and traceability coexist, without slowing teams down.” We approached this not as a tooling upgrade but as a systems realignment. The recommendation was to establish a DevOps Center of Excellence (CoE), not as a team, but as a framework for how delivery should operate across the enterprise. The DevOps CoE focused on six transformation pillars: 1. Assessment & Audit We mapped existing pipelines, infra provisioning methods, and governance steps. This revealed a patchwork of custom logic, manual interventions, and undocumented assumptions. 2. CI/CD Standardization Using GitHub Actions, we established unified pipelines across dev, staging, and production. Every deployment now followed a common, observable, and repeatable path. 3. Infrastructure as Code We shifted provisioning to Terraform, introduced versioned blueprints, and enforced parity across environments. 4. Policy as Code Instead of relying on external approvals or documentation, we embedded compliance checks directly into the CI/CD process. Governance moved from post-deployment to pre-deployment. 5. Rollback Enablement Every deployment had an associated rollback mechanism, tested and documented. Failures became manageable events, not overnight firefights. 6. Monitoring & Observability Dashboards now offered real-time visibility into environment health, deployment status, and system changes, accessible to both engineering and audit teams. This wasn’t about automation for its own sake. It was about creating calm, predictable systems in a complex, regulated environment. The Outcomes: Faster Releases, Fewer Incidents, Greater Visibility Within months, the impact was measurable and meaningful: Metric Result Release Time Reduced by 55% Rollback Incidents Dropped by 61% Developer Autonomy Increased significantly Audit Preparation Time Reduced to near zero Cloud Cost Predictability Improved via consistent IaC Governance Confidence Embedded and observable But the real outcome wasn’t just in the numbers. It was in the culture shift. Releases became quiet. Recoveries became simple. What once required a chain of approvals, escalations, and anxiety, now just worked. Strategic Takeaways for CXOs For leaders in regulated enterprises, this story offers key insights: 1. Governance should be a system, not a process. When compliance is embedded into the CI/CD pipeline, it becomes consistent, enforceable, and invisible. 2. Speed without safety is a risk. But safety without speed is costly. Standardized DevOps helps you avoid both extremes and operate with confidence. 3. Infrastructure isn’t back-office. It’s a business lever. When infrastructure is codified, observable, and auditable, it reduces cost, risk, and friction. 4. Rollbacks are not optional. A resilient system isn’t one that never fails; it’s one that recovers quickly and cleanly. Closing Thought This transformation wasn’t driven by a breakdown, but by foresight. The leadership team understood that clarity scales, while chaos compounds.And they chose to act before it became urgent. In doing so, they didn’t just modernize DevOps.They made delivery consistent, auditable, and ready for growth at scale. Ready to explore this for your enterprise? Whether you’re in financial services, insurance, or any regulated domain, the ability to deliver secure, governed, and repeatable releases is critical. We help enterprise technology leaders build DevOps systems that are engineered for trust, speed, and compliance. 👉 Talk to our team, and let’s build your delivery foundation for the next phase of growth. Frequently Asked Questions 1. What problem was this organization facing? The organization was experiencing growing inconsistency across its delivery processes. While systems were stable, CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure provisioning, and rollback mechanisms varied by team, creating hidden risk, slowing delivery, and making governance difficult to scale in a regulated environment. 2. Why wasn’t this considered a crisis? There were no major outages or failures. Systems were functioning, and releases were happening. However, the lack of standardization and visibility meant risk was accumulating quietly, making the operating model unsustainable as the organization continued to grow. 3. What made this a business issue rather than just a technical one? From a leadership perspective, the core issue was the absence of systemic trust. Executives couldn’t consistently guarantee that releases were compliant, environments were identical, or rollbacks were reliable. In regulated industries, that uncertainty becomes a business liability. 4. What was the primary goal of the transformation? The goal

Read More »
MENU
CONTACT US

Let’s connect!

Loading form…

CONTACT US

Let’s connect!

    Privacy Policy.

    Almost there!

    Download the report

      Privacy Policy.